![research findings research findings](https://i2.wp.com/www.museumlegs.com/g/022-high-school-research-papers-examples-paper.png)
![research findings research findings](https://image3.slideserve.com/6858127/recent-research-findings-implications-for-interventions-n.jpg)
Social blunders are unexpected, and although most people experience them from time to time, individuals with social anxiety disorder tend to view them as especially costly. What do our findings suggest about treatment for social anxiety? In fact, we found that part of the explanation for the strong relationship between blunders and negative social costs was accounted for by social anxious participants’ concerns about revealing self-flaws (e.g., social incompetence) in these types of situations. However, when it came to rating the costs of their own imagined blunders, people with social anxiety disorder provided significantly higher estimates of social costs than people with other anxiety disorders and those without anxiety problems. What did we find? Our results showed that when it came to rating the costs of blunders committed by a third party, people with social anxiety disorder and other anxiety disorders rated the social costs at similar levels, and these ratings were higher than those of people with no anxiety problems. However, this time we included participants with social anxiety disorder, other anxiety disorders, and people with no anxiety problems to see whether there was something specific to social anxiety – rather than anxiety disorders in general – that could help to explain why people with social anxiety view blunders as so costly. In another study (Moscovitch, Waechter, Bielak, Rowa, & McCabe, 2015) we again asked people to imagine themselves and another person committing a social blunder. This result suggests that people with social anxiety hold strict beliefs about social norms – for themselves and others. Our results showed that people with high social anxiety rated the social costs of blunders as being much higher than people with low social anxiety, irrespective of whether they imagined themselves or a third person committing the blunder. In one study (Moscovitch, Rodebaugh, & Hesch, 2012a), we asked people with low and high social anxiety to imagine committing a social blunder, and also imagine watching another person commit that same blunder (e.g., tripping in front of an acquaintance in whom they have a romantic interest or crush ). However, people with social anxiety tend to interpret these mishaps as having negative social costs (e.g., ridicule, rejection, embarrassment or shame) and some of our very own research provides insight into why this might be the case. Most people have experienced some kind of social blunder (e.g., tripping, spilling coffee). In this essay, I discuss the implications of these problems for the conduct and interpretation of research.Social Anxiety Disorder and Social BlundersĪ new article in The Atlantic outlines the different ways that people are affected by social anxiety, and how exposing people to some of their social fears (e.g., having them intentionally commit blunders or mishaps and observe that the effects are typically not as catastrophic as they imagine) can be an important part of treatment for social anxiety. Moreover, for many current scientific fields, claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias. Simulations show that for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true. In this framework, a research finding is less likely to be true when the studies conducted in a field are smaller when effect sizes are smaller when there is a greater number and lesser preselection of tested relationships where there is greater flexibility in designs, definitions, outcomes, and analytical modes when there is greater financial and other interest and prejudice and when more teams are involved in a scientific field in chase of statistical significance. The probability that a research claim is true may depend on study power and bias, the number of other studies on the same question, and, importantly, the ratio of true to no relationships among the relationships probed in each scientific field. There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false.